| ||||||||||||
|
Our Correspondent:
|
|
|
From 'our correspondent' August 29 2006
Response to DCA announcement http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1859394,00.html
The Dept of Constitutional Affairs has announced that it will poll children on an inter-active web site, to get their views on the secrecy of the family Court.
Our own correspondent’s response…… 28 August 2006
Don’t be fooled, this is just another ruse by the DCA to delay and give the pretence of ‘consulting’………The DCA has been involved in one ‘consultation’ , after another….The DCA will continue with the ‘consultations’, until it gets the answer it wants….Which is to keep the secrecy.
The DCA is shit scared that once the press go into the gulag of the Family Court, the rackets and the corruption will be exposed. The DCA do not want the social workers and paediatricians who instigate the cases against the parents, to be identified. Because once they are identified, they can be prosecuted and the claims will be horrendous…..They prefer to let the ‘anonymous ‘ social workers, paediatricians and other ‘professionals’ to continue to earn a living in the gulag of the Family Court, providing perjured evidence in the court, to take children into care and adoption.
This then fuels the ‘supply chain’ of children into foster a care and adoption agencies…That have links to social workers and others within this secret industry.
Consider the following: In this most recent ‘consultation’, the children are being ‘consulted’….we are told…..Would that be the children who are 6 months old, 12 months old, 18 months old, 24 months old, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years 6 years old……At what age will the DCA consider the response ‘valid’……..Or will it be if the response by a 6 month old baby through gummy lips is, ‘ keep the secrecy’.
Don’t be fooled; this ‘consultation’, like the rest is pure hokum. This is the Labour Party ' and its social worker friends, spinning' and appearing to give children some input into the Family Court process.....Absolute tosh!
If the Department of Constitutional Affairs had even the slightest, the very minimal amount of genuine concern....It would not wait but ensure that those cases that were dismissed in the Family Courts, those cases in which parents were awarded costs against the local authority.....would be allowed to provide all the details to the press and media. These after all are the cases in which the parents were deemed INNOCENT in law…Yet they are not to whisper a word about their experiences.
I am referring to cases in which parents have been accused of MSBP, now called Fabricated Induced Illness ( FII )....The cases where the child/children are 'Gillick Competent' ( over the age of 12 and fully understanding of the issues ) . The cases where the parents and the children ( who are Gillick Competent' ) who were awarded costs against the local authority.......Wish to provide ALL the details to the press and media.....That includes the identity of the villain social workers and paediatricians who falsely accused them and prosecuted them in the gulag of the Family Courts. With all the stress and anxiety involved.
If the DCA is genuine about its involvement of children, what stops an ill child, from retelling his/her experiences to the press?
Why are parents who were awarded costs in the Family Courts not allowed to tell their stories?
Children who are in Great Ormond Hospital for Sick Children, regularly tell their stories to the press and media. They appear on TV and radio. What is the difference between the children in Great Ormond Street Hospital and children and parents awarded costs as a result of cases brought against them in the Family Courts?
The difference is that the DCA fears that any such disclosure would identify the concerted corruption that has become endemic in the gulag of the Family Court. We would learn that a number of Dr. Harold Shipman’s have been 'weaving their magic' and falsely accusing innocent and vulnerable parents.....And ill children! (Remember in the interests of the child...They falsely accuse an ill child of imagining an illness! Beat that)
The DCA is not concerned with 'justice'. There is a higher priority....And that is the protection of those who have caused such absolute mayhem in our society ( social workers and paediatricians ) , with their false claims, the removal of children into care and then adoption.......Very often there are links between the social workers and the adoption and fostering agencies! The DCA is afraid that the justice system itself will be shown to be inferior to that operated by President Mugabe's Zimbabwe.
It will cause Tony and his cronies to be the laughing stock, on the world stage. The UK has a formidable reputation of urging China and other countries to introduce 'fairness & transparency' into their justice systems....Yet the UK government is hiding behind the 'secrecy of Family Court proceedings', to avoid disclosure of the greatest scandal bar none. The whole scandal is funded by the state........And Tony Blair, the sexual predator John Prescott (Deputy Prime Minister!!!) and his cronies, know it…END…
Fassit UK Correspondent
Jack Frost author of 'The Gulag of the Family Courts...Book1' ISBN 9 781430 316350
http://www.gulagofthefamilycourts.com/
Please read...
Public awards for dishonourable conduct Why social workers remove babies from their mothers Grandmother faces year in prison Confidentiality and Openness in Family Court Fassit response to BASW Adoptions cannot ever be undone? DCA Phoney Conciliations New DCA announcement - Social Workers Harriet Harman the Response The Labyrinthine links of the 'Little Hitlers' Open or shut case - NO The Political Social Workers Time limits for Compensation in Child Abuse Cases Adoption Fraud is under challenge
|
|
