Information, Help and Advice for Families experiencing frustration in working with Social Services in Child Care Proceedings.

FASSIT PETITION - Please help to Abolish all secrecy in the Family Law Courts and let the daylight of open inquiry illuminate their work. Sign here

Fassit provides specialist information and advice for family members experiencing frustration in working with Social Services in Child protection Proceedings

Rate each CAFCASS officer and other experts (such as psychologists, social workers etc) concerned with your case.

Found any good ones? FNF

 

Mum's bid to open family courts download the petition

 News :  Welsh Assembly aiding Local Authorities in trying to cover-up possible Child Abuse Watch the Video

 

 
 

More Articles: Back | Main | Next

 

 

Doctors in Court over Babies Test

Doctors in Court over Babies Test

Dave Blackhurst, 17 October 2007

Three doctors involved in controversial hospital experiments on a new type of baby incubator 15 years ago are to face a six-week disciplinary hearing. It will be the first time the so-called CNEP research on hundreds of older babies at the University Hospital of North Staffordshire is scrutinised in a public court.

The case will go before the General Medical Council (GMC) next year and follows a string of complaints from Clayton couple Carl and Deborah Henshall.

They have spent the past decade fighting for the GMC to investigate the conduct of paediatricians Dr David Southall, Dr Martin Samuels and Dr Andrew Spencer.

The council has twice thrown out the charges, saying the medics had no case to answer, but the couple had the decision reversed by the Court of Appeal in London.

The case, which will see the user name not allowed answer charges of serious professional misconduct, is now scheduled to go ahead at the GMC's Manchester court between May 6 and June 18. It involves so much evidence that proceedings could be extended by a further month.

The Henshalls claim their baby, Stacey, died as a result of being placed in the CNEP tanks at the Hartshill complex. Another daughter, Sofie, now aged 14, suffered brain damage.

Mr Henshall said: "It's 10 or 11 years since we first heard that the technique that had been used on our babies was untested research and we made our initial complaints to the GMC.

"We are delighted we will finally be getting our day in court.

"At last we will have the many questions about CNEP fully looked into and the doctors involved held to account for their actions."

CNEP tanks worked by lowering the air pressure around a baby's chest, helping it to breathe more naturally than using traditional ventilation with a line into the lungs.

The results found a higher death and brain damage rate among the 122 older babies placed in the tanks than among the same number given ventilation.

The technique was stopped at the hospital in 1999 amid growing public concern and a year later a Government-funded inquiry criticised aspects of the research.

The doctors have always argued the death rate variations were not statistically significant and a follow-up audit of the CNEP babies last year found they had come to no long-term harm.

Besides worries about the procedure itself, the Henshalls also allege that they did not give permission for their babies to use in the research.

Prof David Southall Dr Southall is already banned from child protection work by the GMC for falsely accusing Cheshire lawyer Steve Clark of murdering his two babies by basing his evidence on a television document on the tragedies.

 


And next month he faces a resumed serious misconduct hearing over complaints that he kept secret files on thousands of children.

Mrs Henshall said: "It the GMC strikes him off in those proceedings we intend to call him as a witness in our own case, as he designed the CNEP research."

PIONEERS HOPED TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON older INFANTS
17 October 2007

The Cnep - Continuous Negative Extra-thoracic Pressure - controversy dates back to 1991 when paediatrician Professor David Southall was appointed to the Hartshill complex from London. He had already started the experiments in the capital, and continued them in Stoke-on-Trent.

The aim was to find out whether CNEP, pictured, could add to, or even replace, the normal but more traumatic way of treating babies with breathing problems.

That was - and still is - to pass a ventilator down their windpipes to blow air into their lungs. CNEP gets round that intrusion by lowering pressure around the infant's chest, allowing it to expand on its own and the baby to breathe naturally.

Prof Southall has continually argued that with babies so ill and already desperately clinging to life, the difference was statistically insignificant.

The Government investigation - the Griffiths report - criticised the management and supervision of the study and raised concerns over how consent was secured from parents. Before it was ditched in the late 1990s, CNEP had been used on children in hospital in North Staffordshire.

Other parents who believe their children might also have been victims of these experiments, should contact Mrs. Penny Mellor at ... daretocare1@aol.com

 

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

Investigating allegations of research misconduct

 

 

The David Southall Film
Health Advocate Gregory White writes:
The One Click News
This documentary was made by TV3, Auckland New Zealand, for their 20/20 programme.

 

It won a Quanta's Award for Best Investigative Medical Journalism. It was filmed in Auckland and in England during the early months of 1997 and aired on March 27th 1997.

 

 

 

 

Family’s fury with  Social Services
Merthyr Express Dec 6 2007

Read Article...

Grandparent jailed in Secrecy
Fassit Correspondent Oct 26, 2007

Read Article...

Wales Child abuse cover-up
Times November 24, 2007
Read Article...

Justice for Families

Chaired by John Hemming MP

MP's Campaign

 

 

 

The Sheer scale of the injustice is far worse than anyone can imagine

 Denise Robertson - Itv This Morning

 

Home | Contents | Reforms | Disclaimer

Fassit provides specialist information and advice for family members

 

 

Send mail to Fassit feedback with questions or comments about this web site. Please donate - thank you for spending time on our site. It will be updated frequently. Last modified: March 26, 2008 - Fassit - Families and Social Services Information Team Copyright © 2006 Important: Fassit UK are not responsible for the availability or content of other websites, nor for any information or services available from them.