Fassit provides a information and advice website for family members experiencing frustration in working with Social Services in Child protection Proceedings

FASSIT PETITION - Please help to Abolish all secrecy in the Family Law Courts.

Please Sign here

Fassit provides a information and advice website for family members experiencing frustration in working with Social Services in Child protection Proceedings

Join the New! Fassit forum

To get help on tracing relatives

Click here

 News :  Welsh Assembly aiding Local Authorities in trying to cover-up possible Child Abuse Watch the Video

Children Schools and Families BillVisit Fassit UK

Amazon Store

 

 

 

Our Correspondent: Back | Main | Next

 

 

The Political Social Workers

From our own correspondent

 March 7 2006

Following the epidemic of false allegations made against innocent and vulnerable parents and their children, one puzzle has continued to dominate;

 

  1. Why when in many cases there is documentary evidence that social workers and others have presented perjured evidence to the Family Courts has no prosecution followed?

  2. Why have the police not proceeded with the charges they have informed parents they were going to bring? This includes the CID.

  3. Why when there has been documented evidence recorded by the social workers themselves, identifying social workers as being engaged in child abuse, has no prosecution followed ? 

This has been going on for a number of years and recently it has been getting more blatant.

 

There has to be a reason for this!  And although one might not discover the complete reason for such activity, one might be expected to discover some significant component driving the epidemic of false allegations.

 

We know that social workers have established defacto immunity for themselves, in the Family Courts. But why and how?

 

Could this be a contributory reason for the failure of the police to prosecute those engaged in perjury and other offences in the Family Court?

Could this be the reason in the huge explosion of children taken into Care and then adopted?

 

Consider the following:

This is the current list of MPs and MSPs (Scottish) who were previously social workers or worked for Social Services. (This list is not complete)

 

1.....Tessa Jowell MP. Minister.  Lab

 

2......Beverly Hughes MP......Lab

 

3.......Margaret Hodge MP.....Lab

 

4....   Rachael Squire MP ( Deceased ) .....Lab

 

5........Jane Kennedy   MP........Lab

 

6....   John Austin MP.........Lab

 

7......Paul Goggins MP....Home Office Minister.

 

8.......Hilton Dawson  MP   ( Left Parliament ) ....Lab 

 

9........Meg Munn MP........Lab

 

10.......Hilary Armstrong  MP......Lab

 

11.......Hewell Williams  MP......Lab

 

12.......Julie Morgan MP.....Lab

 

13......Dan Norris  MP....Lab

 

14......Jenny Willot   MP....Lib Dem

 

15.......Anthony Steen  MP   Conservative.

 

16.......Madeline Moon  MP....Lab

 

17......Sian James MP....Lab

 

18....Cathie Jamieson MSP

 

19....Shiona Baird  MSP

 

20.....Scott Barrie  MSP

 

21….. Margaret Curran, MSP. Glasgow, Labour, former social worker

 

22…..Trish Godman, MSP. West Renfrewshire, Labour, former social worker

 

23.....Jonathan Shaw MP who assists Ruth Kelly as her PPS -he was a social worker for Kent CC

24......Ann Coffey MP who was a social worker in fostering and
adoption

25......Mike Wood MP was not only a social worker but chair of Kirklees Social Services Committee before being an MP

26.......Sylvia Heal MP was a social worker

 

27…….Baroness pitkeathley, Lab House of Lords.

 

There are others. Who are they ?

There are further ex social workers in the House of Lords.

 

It has been noticeable that social workers who have been identified being involved in/the perpetrators of perjured evidence in Family Court proceedings or involved in physical abuse against children are seldom prosecuted by the police, despite there being plenty of supporting evidence and documentation

 

So we ask ourselves; Who is in charge of the Police Force that is so reluctant to investigate these Family Court cases?


ANSWER: The Home Office

And who is the Minister at the Home Office responsible
for offences against children?

 

ANSWER...... Paul Goggins (No. 7)

So what’s this chap's previous employment

ANSWER Social worker for 15 years

And where specifically was Paul Goggins employed ?

ANSWER: National Childrens Homes( NCH )

So why isn't any action being taken against those social workers involved in the Rochdale ritual Satanic Abuse Case ? ( In in this case, the BBC broadcast a programme documenting the recorded evidence against social workers involved in perjured statements and actual physical abuse.)

 

ANSWER: NCH is the leading child protection organisation promoting the idea that ritual satanic abuse exists in this country. Even though there is no evidence that it happens.

 

CONCLUSION: 

 

The House of Commons has ever so quietly replaced Eton and Harrow with social workers. No wonder there is all the smoke and mirrors involved in protecting the delinquent and dysfunctional social workers who have been involved in the False Allegation Industry. Their activities are rife in the Family Courts!

 

Some of the social workers are also involved with the adoption and fostering agencies. So the conveyor belt is fully manned, front and back!

 

 No wonder they are concerned to continue the secrecy of the Family Courts !

 

Enquiries are currently perusing leads to follow up social workers who have foster care agency and/or adoption agency connections. This is presently under way.

 

The huge number of social workers now in Parliament cannot be compared with lawyers or others, simply because social  and limited to one employer...The State.

 

Lawyers and doctors traverse a wide area within their disciplines. They function as lawyers and doctors in the private or the public sector.

 

Social workers are definitely and only, State Employees, with a particular esprit de corps. They are now ( and have been since New Labour came to power ) in a very ascendant role, making policy that is unmistakably interventionist and prescriptive.

 

Could the immunity now accorded to social workers engaged in perjury and other offences committed in the Family Courts, be the direct consequence of the influence of the huge number of ex-social workers now in Parliament?

…END…
 

Fassit UK Correspondent

Jack Frost author of 'The Gulag of the Family Courts...Book1' ISBN 9 781430 316350
http://www.gulagofthefamilycourts.com/

 

 

Please read...

 

Public awards for dishonourable conduct
Why social workers remove babies from their mothers
Grandmother faces year in prison
Confidentiality and Openness in Family Court
Fassit response to BASW
Adoptions cannot ever be undone?
DCA Phoney Conciliations
New DCA announcement - Social Workers
Harriet Harman the Response
The Labyrinthine links of the 'Little Hitlers'
Open or shut case - NO
The Political Social Workers
Time limits for Compensation in Child Abuse Cases
Adoption Fraud is under challenge

 

Family’s fury with  Social Services
Merthyr Express Dec 6 2007

Read Article...

Grandparent jailed in Secrecy
Fassit Correspondent Oct 26, 2007

Read Article...

Wales Child abuse cover-up
Times November 24, 2007
Read Article...

Justice for Families

Chaired by John Hemming MP

MP's Campaign

 

The Sheer scale of the injustice is far worse than anyone can imagine

 Denise Robertson - Itv This Morning

Home | Contents | Reforms | Disclaimer

Fassit provides a information and advice website for family members experiencing frustration in working with Social Services in Child protection Proceedings

Fassit provides a information and advice website for family members experiencing frustration in working with Social Services in Child protection Proceedings

 

Send mail to Fassit feedback with questions or comments about this web site. Please donate - thank you for spending time on our site. It will be updated frequently. Last modified: August 13, 2010 - Fassit - Families and Social Services Information Team Copyright © 2006 Important: Fassit UK are not responsible for the availability or content of other websites, nor for any information or services available from them.