Fassit provides a information and advice website for family members experiencing frustration in working with Social Services in Child protection Proceedings

FASSIT PETITION - Please help to Abolish all secrecy in the Family Law Courts.

Please Sign here

Fassit provides a information and advice website for family members experiencing frustration in working with Social Services in Child protection Proceedings

Join the New! Fassit forum

To get help on tracing relatives

Click here

 News :  Welsh Assembly aiding Local Authorities in trying to cover-up possible Child Abuse Watch the Video

Children Schools and Families BillVisit Fassit UK

Amazon Store

 

 

 

Charles Pragnell - Back | Main | Next

 

 

RAD – the Return of a Nightmare

RAD – the Return of a Nightmare

ByCharles Pragnell 3 November 2007

An increasing number of parents are reporting that paediatricians at a teaching hospital in a particular city in the North of England are again using the Reflex Anal Dilatation test as a means of examining their children for sexual abuse.

 

RAD gained notoriety when it was used by two paediatricians in Cleveland, also in the north of England, in 1987 and led to a nightmare of pain and suffering for 121 children and their families. Organised gangs of social workers and police have again descended on families and removed children solely on the basis of a medical report and without carrying out a full assessment of the families and their circumstances, a practice that was deeply deplored by the Report by the Public Inquiry into events in Cleveland and conducted by Justice Butler-Sloss.

 

The Butler-Sloss Report did not make any pronouncement regarding the use of RAD in those cases but it became known that RAD is not a reliable method of identifying sexual abuse of children as it can also indicate other illnesses in children such as severe diarrhoea or constipation, and is extremely painful, degrading, and distressing for the children involved. There is no scientifically conducted research to support the use of RAD, there are no clinically conducted trials to confirm its validity, and no record of its use to obtain statistics of the numbers of false positives. It is therefore a matter of serious dispute in the medical profession as to whether RAD has any validity or utility.

 

One of the children involved in the Cleveland Child Abuse Scandal recently described her ordeal as follows. She was only four years old at the time.

 

We were taken to a foster family overnight and taken to hospital the following morning. It was here that I first met Dr Marietta Higgs. She was the first person there I remember seeing. My clothes were forcefully removed and I was told to kneel naked on the bed with my bottom in the air and my head down on the bed. I felt Dr. Higgs pressing my buttocks apart and she looked for what seemed like forever. Even at such a young age I felt very uncomfortable, and embarrassed, and wondered why anyone would want to be looking at my bottom. It actually hurt too. Dr. Higgs made no attempt to be gentle, and for those few moments I felt like a piece of meat! I felt violated!

 

When Dr. Higgs moved on to examine my brother I could hear him screaming and screaming and when Dr. Higgs had finished my little brother ran off down the ward screaming, still with no clothes on, and had diarrhoea all down the ward. I could see my parent’s in deep distress, their hearts breaking, watching my brother suffering like that. He was only eighteen months old.”.

 

Parents are left to comfort their children afterward and to try to explain to their hysterical children why they did not protect them from such horrendous examinations.

 

So how and why do doctors inflict such abuse and suffering on children and subject them to such inhumane and degrading treatment, which is of course a serious violation of their human rights ?.

 

As the RAD test is an unsound and unsafe method of detecting sexual abuse, the only possible other explanation is that these doctors are engaging in such atrocities for their own perverse and deviant pleasures. It would probably give some paedophiles immense perverted pleasure to examine the anus and genitals of small children in this way and to inflict pain and distress on them whilst doing so yet be safe in the knowledge that they would not be prosecuted for carrying out what they see as their professional duties.

 

When these matters reach the Courts, it will be interesting to see if the doctors are closely questioned on their practices, or whether like other medical experts in the recent past, they are able to convince the Courts that they were acting in the best interests of the children and that their methods were justifiable, albeit highly questionable.

 

ByCharles Pragnell

5 September 2005

 

Diploma in Social Work and Letter of Recognition in Child Care

Expert Witness – Child Protection and Social Care Consultant and Child/Family Advocate.

 

Please read...

 

Family Law and the Dire consequences for Children
Petition answered with Spin and Sophism
The Silence of the Media Lambs!
Doctors in a Dilemma
Are you an `Appropriate’ person?
Childrens Plan
State Terrorism
The Seriously Unhealthy State of Paediatrics
RAD – the Return of a Nightmare
Persecution of Children and Families
Why I  am Petitioning the Prime Minister
Vaccines and Child Abuse Accusations
Why did Sally Clark Suffer and Die?
Perverse Reversal of Child Custody
Child Protection in Kangaroo Courts
Fabricated and induced illness in Children
A History of Man’s Inhumanity
A System out of Control
Forced Adoption

 

Related Article:

The women who went through an ordeal beyond belief
Daily Mail 24th February 2007

Family’s fury with  Social Services
Merthyr Express Dec 6 2007

Read Article...

Grandparent jailed in Secrecy
Fassit Correspondent Oct 26, 2007

Read Article...

Wales Child abuse cover-up
Times November 24, 2007
Read Article...

Justice for Families

Chaired by John Hemming MP

MP's Campaign

 

The Sheer scale of the injustice is far worse than anyone can imagine

 Denise Robertson - Itv This Morning

Home | Contents | Reforms | Disclaimer

Fassit provides a information and advice website for family members experiencing frustration in working with Social Services in Child protection Proceedings

Fassit provides a information and advice website for family members experiencing frustration in working with Social Services in Child protection Proceedings

 

Send mail to Fassit feedback with questions or comments about this web site. Please donate - thank you for spending time on our site. It will be updated frequently. Last modified: August 13, 2010 - Fassit - Families and Social Services Information Team Copyright © 2006 Important: Fassit UK are not responsible for the availability or content of other websites, nor for any information or services available from them.