Information, Help and Advice for Families experiencing frustration in working with Social Services in Child Care Proceedings.

The fact that Baby P was allowed to die despite 60 visits from Haringey Social Services is a national disgrace.

'Child P' Petition

FASSIT PETITION - Please help to Abolish all secrecy in the Family Law Courts.

Sign here

Fassit provides specialist information and advice for family members experiencing frustration in working with Social Services in Child protection Proceedings

Join the New! Fassit forum

The Times Campaign

Family Justice: share your stories and experiences Get Involved

Click here to Get help on tracing relatives

 News :  Welsh Assembly aiding Local Authorities in trying to cover-up possible Child Abuse Watch the Video

 
 

Your stories: Back | Main | Next

 

 

 

A Story of Vicky’s Life

A Story of Vicky’s Life

Published  June 13,  2007 Fassit ©

A Story of Vicky’s Life

Vicky was a 16 weeks premature baby and poorly all her young life, most of it spent in hospital. Vicky’s mother became pregnant in 2003 and could not visit Vicky as often as she would have like at the end of her pregnancy. Just after the birth of her son it was very hard for her and also to find someone to look after the baby, while Vicky was in isolation. Vicky was at that time prone to infections.

Shortly after his birth the Local Authority undertook an assessment of Ms S ability to parent her new born. That assessment found that Ms S was able to parent her son very well recognising his needs and meeting his demands. This is the first time she has been an asset by any local authority.

Regards to Vicky and the involvement of social services her mother ended up with very little rights or responsibilities for Vicky, the Social Services had taken out an Interim Care Order. The Social Services took over and eventually Vicky was transferred from Stepping Hill Hospital Stockport to Manchester Children’s Hospital Pendlebury if and when she was allowed out of hospital she would probably be placed with foster carers. Vicky’s mother was frightened that if she did not give up Vicky, she would end up losing both children.

The Local Authority wanted Vicky Adopted, but mother did not want Vicky adopted.

Although there is no apparent reason, why the mother or maternal grandparents were excluded from seeing her. This is a very clear plan by the social services to Groom for adoption,. And to get rid of the family,. This would only then give the mother and the grandparents indirect contact until adoption takes place, and as the grandparents lived in Cornwall and Vicky in the North West, but the grandparents fought for direct contact for Vicky even to the extreme of going up country on several occasions to court.

The grandparents could not get Legal Aid so they turned to an Organisation called Children Need Families who had a legal adviser. They got papers for 12 months and still got know where, in the meantime they phoned the hospital every week to see how Vicky was doing, all they got told was “she is doing fine” They also asked if she was receiving postcards which they were sending once a week to the hospital, they said yes. The postcards were of animals etc and laminated.

Then one day they phone the hospital to ask how Vicky was to be told “she is not here she has gone home with her foster parent”.

The grandparents decided that this had gone on long enough and got a solicitor who directed them to court, but this took some months. The adoption came up yet again.

The solicitor could not represent them because of the distance and cost so they represented themselves.
In October 2005 the grandparents went to court and that all parties was to send in a skeleton argument and written submission by January 2006.

The court also told the Local Authority to send all relevant paper work to the grandparents for their viewing and to read the medical reports and the Psychological report and that the court would give the social time to find suitable persons for adoption. Afterwards the social pointed out why they did not want the grandparents to see Vicky and that they must read the Psychological Reports.

When they got the Psychological Report they stated that they had concerns about Vicky that it would upset her if she saw the grandparents, but some of the report did not make sense, on one occasion it said that Vicky’s crying was very sad to hear, but was not attention or needy/hurt, but seems soulful and lonely. Another sentence it said that Vicky would look at people smile and blow raspberries and is very endearing it also said that she was more interested in adults than children so why would it upset her (has previously stated) if she would be introduced to her grandparents.

The Psychological Assessment Report was all based on the conversation between the Foster Carer and Psychologist and NOT on what the Psychologist monitored (we have paper work to prove) plus what is this title is she a Child, Criminal, or Education Psychologist this is her true title: -
M.Sc., B.Sc., Dip. Ed. Dip. Criminal. Psych Chartered Forensic/Educational Psychologist. If this is her true identity then what happened to the Child Psychologist also why didn’t all these solicitors notice that her report was biased?

When they went back to court in January 2006 the social were asking the court for an extension to find a suitable adoption parents for Vicky, as they were having a lot of trouble finding someone to take Vicky due to her medical needs. Vicky’s biological mother came to court to tell them that she did not want her daughter to be adopted.
They had another court appearance in May 2006 the judge asked if adoption was still on the cards, the social said that there were no one who was willing to look after Vicky even on long term fostering, just short term fostering. At the same time the issue of Vicky’s operation on her bowl came into question, so they decided on a meeting between the Social, solicitors, Cafcass and the doctor’s to see if it was feasible. The judge asked the grandparents if they still sending cards and photos they replied yes, but he said that they would be excluded of the next meeting. Then the judge summed up and said that the next court hearing will be in September 2006.

Vicky was taken into hospital again to have her operation on July 19th 2006 but after the operation Social Services put a block on all information regarding her well being including child solicitor and Cafcass for two weeks while they were both on holiday and all mother and grandparents knew was that she was very poorly and in intensive care unit.

Then two weeks after her operation the Social Services phone the grandparent to say that Vicky was dying and you have got permission to come up right away to see her. They left right away, about 400 miles and arrived late at night.

The grandparents stayed a few days to see Vicky improve and they were allowed a supervise visits to her bedside, while the foster carer looked on, because she was told by the Social Services not to leave Vicky on her own with them, although there were doctors and nurses all the time at her bedside. Vicky’s started slowly to improve so the grandparents decided to go home in the thought that Vicky would make a full recovery.

The grandparents kept in touch with the hospital every day until a week later they phoned the hospital again to be told that she had a bad night after been taken off the ventilator, so they phoned later that day and a male nurse said that Vicky had passed away, and the foster carer was nursing her.

The Social Services paid for Vicky’s funeral, because she was in their care so that meant the biological mother and grandparents were not consulted with the arrangements of the funeral. It was all about what the carer wanted plus Social Services, they had all the say in what church, even though the church is the same as foster carer went to.

Vicky’s biological mother was complaining to the Social Services, because she had bought the child a little white dress this is what she wanted her daughter to be cremated in. Vicky’s foster carer had already dressed Vicky herself in a dress she had picked, on the morning of the funeral at the chapel of rest, without consulting Vicky’s biological mother. While the grandparents were told to wait in the reception room in the chapel of rest, because someone was attending to Vicky, in their amazement they saw the foster carer coming out.

In the grandparents opinion the carer was a very controlling person, again it was all about what she wanted and not to work together to get through this difficult time. When the biological mother arrived at the chapel of rest she was very upset to see the dress the carer had dressed Vicky in, so she asked the staff if they would help her to change Vicky into the dress her biological mother had brought, and they said yes you see they wanted Vicky to look like a little angel.

When the funeral car came the family was appalled to see that the coffin came out and put back on the back seat of the car, there was no hearse just one car? The next thing they were appalled about was when the funeral car came out and they followed, the cars that belonged to other members of Vicky’s family were forced to stop by two vehicles, which belonged to the carers families it was so that they could be behind the coffin. So by the time they got to the traffic lights, which changed to red, Vicky’s family had lost the funeral precession.

When they finally got to the church, the foster carer families were already out of their vehicles. They all followed the coffin into church; the biological family were amazed to see that the churchwarden took the service.

Vicky’s mother and the foster carer had picked two different hymns to be sung, but because the carer went to this church and the biological mother found out before the funeral, she phoned to ask for her hymn to be sung, so not to upset anyone, the church did not use any hymns, but the ones the church picked. The foster carer family got a mentioned to comfort them, but no mention to Vicky’s family the only comfort they got was from a doctor, who wrote a poem and spoke about how Vicky’s was loved by all at the hospital.

While all of this was going on the Social Service Workers attended the church service. The churchwarden mentioned to the congregation that if anyone wished to attend the foster carers home they can, but the biological family will only be at the crematorium.

This is the time that Victoria’s family could say their final goodbye, has they had not got the chance before, because of the entire incidence that happened earlier.

The churchwarden was already there, the family carried her coffin in and placed it on the alter, the churchwarden asked them to say the Lords Prayer, but as the prayer had started the curtain closed. Then they noticed that the Social workers were there, it was like they had to make sure that this was the end. This service was has far as the family was concerned the quickest funeral in history.

The natural family were devastated to have been so snubbed by Social Services, especially as the foster carer and her family were sent away on a holiday two days after the funeral to help them get over Vicky’s death.

The family has been offered no counselling or support from Social Services and are deeply shocked by their treatment from Social Service, the social worker and team manager have been moved on to other departments.

On the 11th November 2006 we received a letter from Vicky’s social worker stating that the photo’s we sent Vicky that they have no recollection of any photo’s been sent, and some of the cards have been damaged by Vicky chewing them. (Previously mentioned by the judge) We understand from the social that these cards would be put in a folder and that some cards were cut up like a jigsaw. Then we started sending the cards in laminated form, so how can she chew them up without cutting her mouth, (see medical records) impossible.

Also in the letter they state” I understand that you may have the cream/beige coloured teddy given to Vicky by the foster carer. This had been left at Francis House and you brought it to the church. I am sure you will appreciate that this has sentimental value to the carer and (if possible) this should be returned through this office. We will refund postage in this case. I understand that the teddy bear that you purchased for Vicky was never removed from the hospital.

Just remember this would have been Vicky’s birthday; it was the most difficult day for us to receive a letter like this.

On the 29/11/2006 Vicky’s biological mother has been sent a letter informing her that if she does not pay the funeral bill, she will be taken to court. Even though the social has already stated previously that they are paying for the funeral, so why then has my daughter got to pay? What more can they do to this family to hurt our feelings.
The social decided to pay the funeral cost in December 2006 just days before Christmas.

It as been a very difficult few months for the family what with bereavement and so on and not had a proper chance to say our last goodbyes to Vicky. Vicky’s biological mother and family as been devastated and been cheated by social.
So in June 2007 we can finally say our goodbyes to our darling Vicky by bringing her ashes down to Cornwall and scattering her ashes in a beautiful coast line, with all her loving family around.
 

Family’s fury with  Social Services
Merthyr Express Dec 6 2007

Read Article...

Grandparent jailed in Secrecy
Fassit Correspondent Oct 26, 2007

Read Article...

Wales Child abuse cover-up
Times November 24, 2007
Read Article...

Justice for Families

Chaired by John Hemming MP

MP's Campaign

 

 

The Sheer scale of the injustice is far worse than anyone can imagine

 Denise Robertson - Itv This Morning

 

Home | Contents | Reforms | Disclaimer

Fassit provides specialist information and advice for family members

 

 

Send mail to Fassit feedback with questions or comments about this web site. Please donate - thank you for spending time on our site. It will be updated frequently. Last modified: December 26, 2008 - Fassit - Families and Social Services Information Team Copyright © 2006 Important: Fassit UK are not responsible for the availability or content of other websites, nor for any information or services available from them.