"I have not named as
yet any of the so called professionals behind the attempted abduction of Jach
Farrows. If they abuse this child by preventing him from being properly fed ...
names will be named. If I have to use Parliamentary Privilege to name these
child abusers that work for Trafford Social Services - that will happen."
Baby Jach Fallows was born on Friday
5th January 2007 to Amanda Fallows in Wythenshaw Hospital, Manchester. Because
Amanda was her self in care many years ago Social Services have continued to
harass her over the years. They had, however, said that they would not try to
remove this baby. She did, however, put a video message to her other children
who were taken away on the internet. This upset Social Services.
On the same day that Jach was born two social workers tried to abduct him from
the hospital. They did not have a court order and are not allowed to take babies
away without a court order. The attempt to abduct him therefore, I would think,
is a criminal offence. They have, however, threatened to go to court to get an
Emergency Protection Order to take Jach into care.
There was a case that looked at the taking into care of breastfed babies. This
case concluded that if a baby needs to be taken into care then the mother must
be allowed to continue breastfeeding. With a new born child this means 24 hour
contact. The argument we will be using is that if the court really believes that
the baby needs to be taken into care then the mother must stay with the baby.
There are a lot of alternatives.
However, the grinding cogs of the "child protection" industry tend to work
towards separating families. Hence they will want to keep the mother and father
out of the issue. For the moment court proceedings have not started. Court
Proceedings start when the papers are issued on a case. Hence this case is not
secret ... yet. It will move into secrecy if court proceeding start. Do not
expect me to comment if it becomes covered by the relevant statutes.
This is one of a number of cases I am aware of (one in Kent, one in
Staffordshire) that involve children from care being parents. Children from care
often have a great fear of Social Services. This causes substantially more
problems when social services get involved.
There is no sense having a system that gradually takes the whole of human
society into care. On average being taken into care is damaging to the child. We
are running an insane system that needs to be brought into rational behaviour.
Hopefully the judge that looks at Jach's case will not be one of the "Justice
Rubberstamps" that just believe the words from the social workers. Hopefully the
child will be first thought of. What is in the "interests of the child" is to be
allowed to continue to receive milk from his mother.
There are some really good judges in the Family Division. Munby J is clearly
one. Sadly there are too few of him.
